Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 18669

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S. SOUNTHAR, J
Mr.S.N.Sundaram – Appellant
Versus
Smt.Pattammal (deceased) – Respondent
SA No. 133 of 2020

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.V.Srikanth
For the Respondents: R1-Not ready in notice, M/s.R.Subramanian for R2 & R3, Mr.V.B.Thirupathi Kumar for R4 to R6

Withdrawal of appeal permitted when counsel requests, leading to dismissal without costs.

Headnote:The appellant sought permission to withdraw the appeal, which was granted by the Court. The matter involved a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure and was related to a judgment and decree from a lower court. The Court dismissed the second appeal as withdrawn and noted that there were no costs.

Table of Content
1. counsel's request to withdraw appeal. (Para 1)
2. appeal dismissed as withdrawn. (Para 2)

JUDGMENT

The learned Counsel appearing for the appellant seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the second appeal. He also made an endorsement to that effect in the court bundle.

2. In view of the endorsement and submission made by the learned counsel for the appellant, this second appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 18669

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASS. SOUNTHAR, JMr.S.N.Sundaram – AppellantVersusSmt.Pattammal (deceased) – RespondentSA No. 133 of 2020

Withdrawal of appeal permitted when counsel requests, leading to dismissal without costs.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S. SOUNTHAR, J
Mr.S.N.Sundaram – Appellant
Versus
Smt.Pattammal (deceased) – Respondent
SA No. 133 of 2020