Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J
M.Meena Vignesh – Appellant
Versus
The State of Tamil Nadu – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's claims regarding bond invalidity and psychological health issues. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. discussions on legal precedents relating to bond enforcement. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's analysis on service conditions and responsibilities under agreements. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. consideration of the petitioner's well-being and implications for document return. (Para 7) |
| 5. final ruling on the enforceability of the bond and certificate return. (Para 8) |
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY W.P.No.49758 of 2025 and W.M.P.No.55643 of 2025 M.Meena Vignesh .. Petitioner Versus
1. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Namakkal Kavingar Maaligai, Fort St. George, Chennai – 600 009.
2. The Director, Directorate of Medical Education, No.162, Periyar E.V.R. High Road, Kilpauk, Chennai – 600 010.
3. The Registrar, The Tamil Nadu Dr MGR Medical University, No.69, Anna Salai, Guindy, Chennai – 600 032.
4. The Dean, JKKN Dental College and Hospital, Natarajapuram, Kumarapalayam, Namakkal District – 638 183. .. Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ of Declaration, declaring the cla
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
