Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CJ, G.ARUL MURUGAN, J
S.Ganapathy – Appellant
Versus
1.The District Collector Kancheepuram District. 2.The General Manager Southern Railway, Office of southern Railway, EVR Periyar High Road, Chennai-3 3.The Railway Assistant Divisional Engineer Southern Railways, Arakkonam Division, Arakkonam. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks direction regarding representation. (Para 3) |
| 2. court clarifies no opinion on merits. (Para 4) |
| 3. writ petition disposed without costs. (Para 5) |
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 09.03.2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN WP No.8500 of 2026 S.Ganapathy S/o.Sarangapani, No.13C, Thalaiyari Street, Konnerikuppam, Big Kancheepuram, Kancheepuram District -631 502 : Petitioner versus
1.The District Collector Kancheepuram District. 2.The General Manager Southern Railway, Office of southern Railway, EVR Periyar High Road, Chennai-3
3.The Railway Assistant Divisional Engineer Southern Railways, Arakkonam Division, Arakkonam. : Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing respondents 2 to 3 to consider the petitioner’s representations dated 28.07.2025 consequently direct the respondents to drop the proposal to construct a compound wall blocking the existing the public road in T.S.No.116/6, old S.No.1167/B1 in Konnerikuppam Village, Ward No.4, Block No.46, Kancheepuram Taluk and District.
For P
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
