SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 18704

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CJ, G.ARUL MURUGAN, J
Kumar S/o.Perumal – Appellant
Versus
The District collector Salem District – Respondent
W.P.No.8721 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Ms.M.Pavitra
For the Respondents:Mr.M.Habeeb Rahman Government Advocate for R1 to R5

Court affirms that writ petitions under Article 226 can direct state authorities to address public land encroachments.

Headnote:This judgment analyzes the petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a writ of mandamus against encroachment on government land. The petitioner sought removal of encroachment and the respondents were directed to conduct a survey and take action. The court found no need for further adjudication as the state had committed to resolving encroachment under existing laws. The court disposed of the petition accordingly.

Table of Content
1. petition seeks action against public land encroachment. (Para 1 , 2)
2. petitioner limits request to removal of encroachment. (Para 3)
3. court instructs state to survey and resolve encroachment. (Para 4)

The present writ petition, styled as public interest litigation, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeks a direction to respondent Nos.1 to 5 to remove the encroachment made by the sixth respondent on the government poramboke land/public pathway comprising in Survey Nos.54/2 and 55 situated at Amman Koil Kadu, Aadaiyur Village, Edappadi Taluk, Salem District, as also a direction to respondent Nos.1 to 5 to lay a road by considering the representation dated 16.10.2025 within a time frame.

2. Learned counsel for respondent/State, on written instructions, stated that the Edappadi Taluk Surveyor has issued summons to conduct survey of the aforesaid survey numbers on 13.3.2026. If any encroachment is identified during the survey conducted on the said date, action will be taken to remove the encroachment under the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner is not pressing for the second relief with regard to laying the road and has restricted her prayer to removal of encroachment alone.

4. In view of the written statement submitted by learned counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 5, no further adjudication is required in this public interest litigation. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of directing respondent Nos.1 to 5 to complete the survey and take a decision in accordance with law and pass a reasoned and speaking order as expeditiously as possible.

There shall be no order as to costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top