Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 18751

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR, J
G.Dheenathayalan – Appellant
Versus
Dr.M.Sai Kumar, I.A.S. – Respondent
W.P.(MD) No.31584 of 2025

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.S.Visvalingam
For the Respondents:Mr.Om Prakash Government Advocate

A contempt petition was closed after finding compliance with the court's order, negating allegations of willful disobedience.

Headnote:The contempt petition was filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the contemnor for not complying with the court order dated 06.11.2025. Upon consideration, the court noted that the contemnor had complied by issuing the necessary proceedings on 18.02.2026. The main issue was whether the respondent had willfully disobeyed the court's order. The court concluded that, given the compliance, the contempt petition is hereby closed.

Table of Content
1. contempt petition initiated due to alleged disobedience. (Para 1)
2. court observed compliance with prior order. (Para 2)

O R D E R

This contempt case has been filed by the petitioner complaining willful disobedience of the order dated 06.11.2025, in W.P.(MD) No.31584 of

2025, passed by this Court.

2. Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, learned counsel on either side submitted that the respondent / contemnor has complied with the order passed by this Court by issuing a proceedings dated

18.02.2026.

3. In the said circumstances, this contempt petition is closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 18751

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASMUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR, JG.Dheenathayalan – AppellantVersusDr.M.Sai Kumar, I.A.S. – RespondentW.P.(MD) No.31584 of 2025

A contempt petition was closed after finding compliance with the court's order, negating allegations of willful disobedience.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR, J
G.Dheenathayalan – Appellant
Versus
Dr.M.Sai Kumar, I.A.S. – Respondent
W.P.(MD) No.31584 of 2025