2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 18766

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI, J
P.Paramasivam – Appellant
Versus
R.Chinnasamy Udayar – Respondent
S.A.No.1614 of 2011 | M.P.No.1 of 2011

The absence of representation on behalf of the appellant led to the dismissal of the appeal for default.

Headnote:In this judgment, under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, the court considered an appeal against a decision confirming a decree by the subordinate judge. The appellants failed to appear, prompting the court to dismiss the appeal for default. The judgment mainly revolves around procedural aspects and the lack of representation. The issue framed was on whether the absence of the appellant warranted a dismissal. Ultimately, the court concluded, stating, 'Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.'