Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
C.V. Karthikeyan, K.Kumaresh Babu, JJ
Union of India Rep.by the Chief Postmaster General, Tamil Nadu Circle, Anna Salai, Chennai-600 002. – Appellant
Versus
T Shanthi W/o.Late R.Thirugnanamani. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the court examines the legality of a previous administrative decision through writ petition. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. repeated applications for compassionate appointment considered but rejected based on merit points. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. arguments presented emphasize family hardship and procedural errors in previous rejections. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. court affirms the necessity of systematic merit evaluation in compassionate appointment claims. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 5. court concludes that prior rejections validate the refusal of current claims for compassionate appointments. (Para 11 , 12) |
(Order of the Court was made by K.Kumaresh Babu J.)
The present writ petition has been filed to quash the order passed by the
3rd respondent /Central Administrative Tribunal, Chennai, dated 18.04.2023 made in OA/310/00331/2023.
2. Heard Mr.K.Srinivasa Murthy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms.L.Parvinbanu, learned counsel for the respondents 1 and 2.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the father of the 2nd respondent, who was working as a Postman, had died in service. An application for Compassionate appointment was originally sought by the first respondent for her el
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
