Back
Next 
2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 18852
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, K.SURENDER, JJ
N.A.Dharmarajan – Appellant
Versus
V.Sathya, The Tahsildar, Kancheepuram – Respondent
Cont.P.No.2362 of 2024|W.P.No.34297 of 2023
Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.T.S.Baskaran
For the Respondents: Mr.D.Ravichander, Spl. Govt. Pleader for R1, Mr.R.A.Gopinath, Standing Counsel for R2
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.T.S.Baskaran
For the Respondents: Mr.D.Ravichander, Spl. Govt. Pleader for R1, Mr.R.A.Gopinath, Standing Counsel for R2
Court emphasized adherence to judicial orders under Contempt of Courts Act with emphasis on compliance.
Headnote:This judgment addresses compliance with court orders under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, emphasizing the importance of adherence to judicial directives. The court finds that the previous order dated 04.03.2024 in W.P.No.34297 of 2023 has been complied with, thus concluding the contempt petition. As a result of the compliance, the petition is closed.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. compliance with court order (Para 1) |
| 2. conclusion of the petition (Para 2) |
(Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.)
The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties would submit that the order passed by this Court dated 04.03.2024 in W.P.No.34297 of 2023 has been complied with.
2. Recording the said submission, this Contempt Petition stands closed (S.M.S., J.) (K.S.,J.)
