SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 18852

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, K.SURENDER, JJ
N.A.Dharmarajan – Appellant
Versus
V.Sathya, The Tahsildar, Kancheepuram – Respondent
Cont.P.No.2362 of 2024|W.P.No.34297 of 2023



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.T.S.Baskaran
For the Respondents: Mr.D.Ravichander, Spl. Govt. Pleader for R1, Mr.R.A.Gopinath, Standing Counsel for R2

Court emphasized adherence to judicial orders under Contempt of Courts Act with emphasis on compliance.

Headnote:This judgment addresses compliance with court orders under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, emphasizing the importance of adherence to judicial directives. The court finds that the previous order dated 04.03.2024 in W.P.No.34297 of 2023 has been complied with, thus concluding the contempt petition. As a result of the compliance, the petition is closed.

Table of Content
1. compliance with court order (Para 1)
2. conclusion of the petition (Para 2)

(Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.)

The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties would submit that the order passed by this Court dated 04.03.2024 in W.P.No.34297 of 2023 has been complied with.

2. Recording the said submission, this Contempt Petition stands closed (S.M.S., J.) (K.S.,J.)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top