Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J
Anish – Appellant
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. quashing of f.i.r. (Para 1) |
| 2. compromise reached. (Para 2) |
| 3. final decision: quashing order. (Para 3) |
ORDER
The present petition has been filed by the accused in Crime No.26 of
2026 on the file of the first respondent seeking to quash the F.I.R wherein they have been implicated for the offence under Section 303(2) BNS 2023.
2.Pending investigation, the defacto complainant and the petitioners have entered into a compromise wherein it has been agreed that the F.I.R may be quashed. The defacto complainant is present on 05.03.2026 and he had expressed his willingness to quash the F.I.R.
3.In view of the above said facts, the F.I.R in Crime No.26 of 2026 on the file of the fist respondent is hereby quashed and this Criminal Original Petition stands allowed.
09-03-2026 msa To
1.The Sub Inspector of Police Colachel Police Station Kanyakumari District Crime No.26 of 2026
2.The Additional Public Prosecutor Madurai Bench of Madras High Court Madurai R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
