Back
2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 18886
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
K.KUMARESH BABU, J
N.Thilagavathi – Appellant
Versus
S.Sureshkumar – Respondent
CIVIL REVISION PETITION | C.M.P.No.9870 of 2019
Important Points
Subject
Civil Law - Procedural Law
Headnote
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.N.Manokaran
For the Respondents: Not ready in notice
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. civil revision petition filed to set aside dismissal. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court observes lack of diligence in prosecution. (Para 3) |
| 3. court allows civil revision petition and closes connected petitions. (Para 4) |
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 05-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU and C.M.P.No.9870 of 2019
1. N.Thilagavathi
2. N.Nataraj ..Petitioner(s)
Vs S.Sureshkumar ..Respondent(s)
Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to set aside the Fair and Decreetal order 22/02/2019 made in I.A.No.55/2018 in CMA.CFR.No.7973/2017 on the file of the learned Sub Court, Kangayam.
For Petitioner(s): Mr.N.Manokaran For Respondent(s): Not ready in notice
ORDER
The present Civil Revision Petition has been filed to set aside the Fair and Decreetal order 22.02.2019 made in I.A.No.55/2018 in CMA.CFR.No.7973/2017 on the file of the learned Sub Court, Kangayam.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the suit in which the interim orders have been passed, had been dismissed for default on
22.01.2025 and it is also stated that no restoration petition has been filed.
3. This would show that the plaintiff in the suit/respondent is not diligent enough in prosecuting the same.
4. As the suit itself was dismissed for default, the present Civil Revision Petition stands allowed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
