IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M.DHANDAPANI, J
Umang Nidhi – Appellant
Versus
Chettinad Vidyashram, R.A. Puram, Chennai – 600 028 – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. right to education without coercive conditions. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. responses and consensus on examination settings. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. disposal of the petition following court's directions. (Para 6) |
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 05.03.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI And W.M.P.No.7294 of 2026 Umang Nidhi, Minor Represented by his sister Shreya Nidhi ... Petitioner Vs.
1 Chettinad Vidyashram, R.A. Puram, Chennai – 600 028, Represented by its Management
2 The Principal, Chettinad Vidyashram, R.A. Puram, Chennai – 600 028. 3 Ms. Deepa Ayer
4 Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE), Represented by its Chairman Shiksha Kendra, New Delhi.
5 The Regional Officer, CBSE Regional Office, Chennai.
6 State of Tamil Nadu Represented by its Secretary, School Education Department, Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009. ... Respondents Prayer:
Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent 1-2 to forthwith permit the petitioner to appear in all Class XI Examinations, including internal and annual examinations, without insisting upon attendance or imposing any coercive or adverse conditions.
For
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.