SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 18983

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N.SATHISH KUMAR, D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, JJ
Sasikumar – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector, Virudhunagar District – Respondent
W.P.(MD)No.2194 of 2026 | W.M.P.(MD)Nos.1722 to 1724 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellant: Mr.S.Balamurugan
For R1 to R5:Mr.P.T.Thiraviam Government Advocate
For R6: No Appearance
For R7: Mr.A.Balaji

Court upheld the dismissal of arbitrary auction proceedings and mandated timely action for environmental management.

Headnote:The Writ Petition challenges the proceedings of the fifth respondent regarding a public auction, claiming it was illegal and arbitrary under the Tamil Nadu Panchayats Rules. The petitioner seeks to quash these proceedings and direct a fresh auction. The court acknowledges the invasive nature of the tree species involved and determines the successful bidder should undertake the removal of the trees promptly. The judgment underscores the necessity for timely completion of the work and does not find urgency for a detailed inquiry.

Table of Content
1. challenge to auction proceedings under panchayats rules. (Para 1 , 2)
2. discussion on necessity and urgency of work completion. (Para 3 , 4)
3. final decision directing prompt action on tree removal. (Para 5)

7.V.V.S.S.Suresh ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the impugned proceedings of the fifth respondent in Na.Ka.No.A6/1382/2023 dated 06.01.2026 and to quash the same as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the Tamil Nadu Panchayats (Procedure for Conducting Public Auction of Leases and Sales in the Panchayats) Rules, 2001 and consequently, to direct the respondents 1 to 6 to conduct a fresh public auction in a fair, transparent and competitive manner after proper enumeration, valuation, publication and approval, for cutting and removal of Seemai Karuvelam trees in Mallakkottai and Senkulam water bodies, Periyakulam Village Panchayat, Tiruchuli Taluk, Virudhunagar District and to direct the respondents 1 to 4 to conduct an enquiry into the manner in which the impugned auction was conducted and confirmed and to fix responsibility for the loss caused to public revenue, and take appropriate action including disciplinary proceedings, surcharge, recovery against the erring officials, within a time frame fixed by this Court.

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Balamurugan For R1 to R5 : Mr.P.T.Thiraviam Government Advocate For R6 : No Appearance For R7 : Mr.A.Balaji

ORDER

The Writ Petition has been filed challenging the impugned proceedings of the fifth respondent in Na.Ka.No.A6/1382/2023, dated 06.01.2026, and to quash the same as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the Tamil Nadu Panchayats (Procedure for Conducting Public Auction of Leases and Sales in the Panchayats) Rules, 2001. Consequently, the petitioner seeks a direction to the respondents 1 to 6 to conduct a fresh public auction in a fair, transparent and competitive manner, after proper enumeration, valuation, publication and approval, for cutting and removal of Seemai Karuvelam trees in Mallakkottai and Senkulam water bodies in Periyakulam Village Panchayat, Tiruchuli Taluk, Virudhunagar District. The petitioner has also sought a direction to the respondents 1 to 4 to conduct an enquiry into the manner in which the impugned auction was conducted and confirmed, to fix responsibility for the loss caused to public revenue, and to take appropriate action, including disciplinary proceedings, surcharge and recovery, against the erring officials.

2. Upon hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and upon perusing the materials available on record, the contention of the petitioner is that the wood would fetch a higher amount, whereas the tender has been given for a lesser amount.

3. The learned Government Advocate would submit that the work order has already been issued and the work is about to commence.

4. Considering the fact that the species involved is an invasive species, and the State is required to complete the work at the earliest, and the successful bidder is willing to carry out the work in a swift manner, a detailed enquiry as to the amount that the wood would fetch need not be undertaken in the present writ petition.

5. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the successful bidder to forthwith undertake the work and properly uproot the trees. Thereafter, the authorities shall ensure that the area is maintained free from Prosopis Juliflora. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top