Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
C.KUMARAPPAN, J
Rabindra Kumar Mallick – Appellant
Versus
State represented by The Inspector of Police, PEW Ambattur Police Station, Ambattur, Chennai – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. request for bail based on prior detention. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. opposition to bail due to multiple prior cases. (Para 4) |
| 3. risk of misuse of liberty if bail is granted. (Para 5 , 6) |
ORDER
The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on
15.12.2025 for the alleged offences under Sections 8(c) and 20(b)(ii)(C) of the NDPS Act , in Crime No.195 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.
2. It is the case of the prosecution that the petitioner was found in possession of 10 kilograms of ganja chocolates. Hence, the case.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent and that the contraband seized is of commercial quantity. He would further submit that the petitioner has been in custody since 15.12.2025 and therefore prayed for the grant of bail to the petitioner.
4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent, while opposing the grant of bail to the petitioner, submitted that there are ten previous cases against the petitioner. It was further submitted that if the petitioner is enlarged on bail, there is every possibility of the petitioner misusing the liberty granted b
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
