Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M. NIRMAL KUMAR, J
Venkatesan – Appellant
Versus
The State Rep by, The Inspector of Police – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. extension of time for executing sureties due to personal circumstances. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. petitioner's inability to execute due to family emergency. (Para 3) |
| 3. grant of extension by the court. (Para 4) |
ORDER
The present Criminal Original Petition is filed seeking extension of further two weeks time to execute the sureties as per the order dated 13.11.2025 passed in Crl.M.P. No.2 of 2025 in Crl.A.No.1378 of 2025 by the learned XVIII Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that on completion of the trial, by judgment dated 15.10.2025 in C.C.No.176 of 2012, the learned VI Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai, found the petitioner/accused guilty, convicted him and sentenced him to undergo two years simple imprisonment and to pay fine of Rs.1,000/- for the offence under Section 304(A) of IPC; to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- each for the two counts for the offence under Section 338 of IPC; to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- for the offence under Section 184 of the Motor Vehicles Act and to pay a fine of Rs.2,000/- for the offence under Section 185 of the Motor Vehicles Act, in default, to undergo simple imprisonment of one w
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
