Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
K.KUMARESH BABU, J
V. Krishnan – Appellant
Versus
E. Vijayalakshmi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of filing a revision petition regarding a promissory note (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments presented by respondent's counsel against granting leave to defend (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. court's observations on the necessity of leave to defend when fraud is alleged (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 04-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU and CMP No. 12423 of 2022 V. Krishnan ..Petitioner(s)
Vs E. Vijayalakshmi ..Respondent(s)
Prayer : This petition has been filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure , to set aside the decretal order dated 21.04.2022 made in I.A. No. 2 of 2021 in O.S. No. 476 of 2017 on the file of the X Assistant Judge, XII Assistant City Civil Court (FAC), Chennai.
For Petitioner(s): Mr. G.Prabhakar For Respondent(s): Mr. M.Theiva Kumar
O R D E R
This Civil Revision Petition has been filed to set aside the decretal order dated 21.04.2022 made in I.A. No. 2 of 2021 in O.S. No. 476 of 2017 on the file of the X Assistant Judge, XII Assistant City Civil Court (FAC), Chennai. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the respondent herein had instituted a suit for recovery of m
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
