SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 19075

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J
K.Thangaraj – Appellant
Versus
A.Uma Sahina – Respondent
C.R.P(MD)No.652 of 2023|C.M.P(MD)No.3050 of 2023



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: No appearance
For the Respondents: No appearance

Failure to appear in court leads to dismissal of petition for default.

Headnote:The judgment pertains to C.R.P(MD)No.652 of 2023 concerning the Civil Revision Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution, where the Petitioners failed to appear for hearings on multiple dates. The Court determined the lack of interest from Petitioners. As per the finding, the Petition is dismissed for default. The final outcome is that the connected Miscellaneous Petition is also closed.

O R D E R

There has been no appearance for the Petitioners on

2.3.2026, 3.3.2026 and today ie., on 5.3.2026. This shows that the Petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the Civil Revision petition.

2.Hence the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for default.

No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top