SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 19144

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J
Rasulappan A – Appellant
Versus
The Sub-Registrar Mettupalayam Sub-Register Office, Mettupalayam – Respondent
Writ Petition



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.A.Arun Kumar
For the Respondents: Mr.U.Baranidharan, Special Government Pleader (For R1)

The court emphasized the necessity of notice and opportunity to be heard prior to refusal of registration in property matters.

Headnote:This judgment discusses the refusal of the first respondent to register a sale deed presented by the petitioner. The court found that no interim injunction was in place preventing this registration and noted the absence of notice to respondents 2 to 5 prior to the refusal. The order quashes the refusal slip and remands the matter for fresh consideration, requiring the first respondent to hear all parties involved and decide on registration within twelve weeks. The key issues include jurisdiction and procedural propriety in registration matters.

Table of Content
1. review of refusal to register due to pending disputes. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 5)
2. need for remand for fresh consideration. (Para 4)
3. court's directive for proper procedure and hearing. (Para 6 , 9)

O R D E R

This Writ Petition has been filed challenging the impugned refusal check slip dated 07.01.2026 issued by the 1st respondent, refusing to register the sale deed presented by the petitioner for registration.

2.The reason for refusal given by the 1st respondent are as follows:-

(a)Civil Suit is pending between the petitioner and the respondents 2 to 5. (b)A protest petition has been lodged by the respondents 2 to 5 requesting the 1st respondent not to register any documents presented by the petitioner for registration.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is no interim injunction granted in favour of the respondents 2 to 5 in the Civil Suit filed by him and therefore, there is no prohibition for the 1st respondent to register the sale deed presented by the petitioner for registration.

4.No prejudice would be caused to the respondents if the matter is remanded back to the 1st respondent for fresh consideration on merits and in accordance with law, after hearing the objections of the respondents 2 to 5 and any other third party, whom the 1st respondent deem fit to enquire, with regard to proposal of the petitioner to register the sale deed presented by him for registration. This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of their respective contentions.

5.Admittedly, the respondents 2 to 5 were not put on notice by the 1st respondent before issuing the impugned refusal check slip refusing to register the sale deed presented by the petitioner for registration. The petitioner also categorically contends before this Court that there is no interim injunction granted by the Civil Court in favour of the respondents 2 to 5 to prevent the 1st respondent from registering the sale deed presented by the petitioner for registration.

6.After giving due consideration for the aforementioned factors in the interest of justice, this Court deems it fit to quash the impugned refusal check slip dated 07.01.2026 and remand the matter back to the very same respondents for fresh consideration on merits and in accordance with law, after granting opportunity of hearing to the petitioner as well as the respondents 2 to 5.

7.Mr.U.Baranidharan, learned Special Government Pleader, accepts notice on behalf of the 1st respondent. Since no adverse orders are passed in this Writ Petition against the respondents 2 to 5, notice to the respondents 2 to 5 is disposed with by this Court.

8.For the foregoing reasons, the impugned refusal check slip dated

07.01.2026 issued by the 1st respondent is hereby quashed and the matter is remanded back to the 1st respondent for fresh consideration on merits and in accordance with law. The 1st respondent shall issue notice both to the petitioner as well as the respondents 2 to 5 and any other third party whom the 1st respondent deem fit to enquire and after hearing their respective contentions and after giving due consideration to the supporting documents produced by them, shall take a final decision with regard to registration of the sale deed dated 07.01.2026 presented by the petitioner for registration. The aforesaid exercise shall be completed by the 1st respondent within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

9.With the above direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top