Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S. M. SUBRAMANIAM, K. SURENDER, JJ
V.Raghu – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector Collectorate Office, Singaravelan Maligai, No.62,Rajaji Salai, Chennai-600 001. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge against final notice under land encroachment law. (Para 1) |
| 2. petitioner retains right to appeal against notice issued. (Para 2) |
| 3. writ petition dismissed; costs not awarded. (Para 3) |
(Order of the Court was made by S.M.Subramaniam J.)
Writ on hand has been instituted challenging final notice under Section
6 of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905.
2. It is not in dispute that Section 7 notice was issued and petitioner submitted his explanation. Thereafter, the impugned Section 6 notice was issued. Thus, petitioner may prefer an appeal under Section 10 of the Act before the District Collector.
3. Granting liberty to the petitioner to prefer an appeal under Section 10 of the Act, the writ petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions, if any, are closed.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
