Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR, J
S.Helen Anitha – Appellant
Versus
Director of Secondary Education, DPI Complex, College Road, Chennai - 600 006. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. entitlement to service consideration for pay fixation. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. arguments on the applicability of past service consideration. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 3. court's observation on applicability of previous judgments. (Para 9) |
| 4. rationale for supporting the petitioner's claim. (Para 10) |
O R D E R
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the first to third respondents.
2. This Writ Petition has been filed challenging the order of the second respondent dated 23.12.2020 bearing reference No.Oo.Mu.No. 4043/Aa3/2020 and the consequential order of the third respondent dated
07.01.2021 bearing reference No.Oo.Mu.No.5147/A5/2019.
3. The petitioner, who was initially appointed as B.T. Assistant (Science) in Nathan Girls Higher Secondary School, Nerkundram, Ponneri Educational District, Thiruvallur District on 04.06.2007, was subsequently selected and appointed as B.T. Assistant (Science) in T.D.T.A. Higher Secondary School, Christianagaram, Thoothukudi District on 08.08.2014 under C.S.I. - Thoothukudi Nazareth Diocese Corporation Management.
4. Accordingly, she was relieved from the previous school and joined T.D.T.A. H
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
