SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 19216

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR, J
Dr.Kavinbharathi – Appellant
Versus
The Principal Secretary, Government of Tamil Nadu, Health and Family Welfare Department, Secretariat, Chennai - 9 – Respondent
Writ Petition



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.K.Rajeswaran
For the Respondents: Mr.N.Ramesh Arumugam

Certificates cannot be withheld on bond violations; educational documents are not marketable commodities.

Headnote:Statute Analysis: The petitioner filed for a Writ of Mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Facts of the Case: Petitioner executed a bond to serve the Government for two years after completing her MBBS and postgraduate course. The petitioner served 18 months but was not allocated duty for the remaining six months.

Findings of Court:
The court highlighted that educational certificates are not marketable commodities and cannot be withheld due to incomplete bond conditions.

Issues: The court framed the question regarding the return of certificates based on the bond conditions not being fully served.

Ratio Decidendi: The court quoted past rulings asserting that certificates could not be retained despite bond violations as per the principles of contract law.

Result: The fifth respondent is directed to return the original certificates/documents to the petitioner forthwith.

Table of Content
1. petitioner's request for document return (Para 1 , 2)
2. respondents' obligation under the bond (Para 3)
3. legal precedent on retaining educational certificates (Para 4 , 5)
4. court's directive for document return (Para 6)
5. finality of court's decision (Para 7)

O R D E R

The petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the fifth respondent College to return the original certificates and documents furnished by her at the time of admission to the post-graduate course.

2. The petitioner, after completing her MBBS course, joined a post- graduate course in the fifth respondent College. At the time of securing admission, the petitioner executed a bond undertaking to serve the Government of Tamil Nadu for a period of two years. After successfully completing the course, the petitioner served the Government of Tamil Nadu for a period of 18 months. According to the petitioner, she could not complete the remaining six months as no duty was allotted to her by the Government.

3. Mr. N. Ramesh Arumugam, learned Government Advocate, who accepts notice on behalf of the respondents, on instructions, submitted that the petitioner, having executed the undertaking, is under an obligation to serve the Government of Tamil Nadu for a period of two years and therefore, she is not entitled to the return of the original certificates/documents.

4. The submissions made by the learned counsel on either side have been duly considered.

5. A similar issue came up for consideration before the Principal Bench of this Court in W.A.Nos.2256, 2257 and 2259 of 2022, wherein the Hon’ble Division Bench held as follows:

“2.The appellants / writ petitioners had undergone Post Graduate Diploma and Post Graduate Degree courses in the third respondent colleges. While securing admission, they had executed bonds undertaking to serve the Government of Tamil Nadu for a period of two years. The bond period has since expired. Now, the appellants / petitioners are in need of original certificates so as to pursue higher education. The authorities are taking the stand that since the bond conditions have not been fulfilled, they would not return the certificates. It has been held in more than one case that Educational Certificates are not marketable commodities and therefore, they cannot be withheld.

[R.D.Saxena -Vs- Balram Prasad Sharma 2000 (7)

SCC 246] and [S.Muthukamakshi (Vs) Anna University (2013) 1 CTC 595].

3.In this view of the matter, the respective colleges are directed to return the petition mentioned original certificates to the appellants / writ petitioners forthwith and without any delay. The respondents are at liberty to proceed against the appellants / writ petitioners for violation of bond conditions. If according to the authorities, the writ petitioners have to pay damages, it is open to them to file a Civil Suit or take recourse to any other remedy for recovering the same but on that ground, the certificates cannot be retained. There can never be a general lien on educational certificates in terms of Section

171 of the Contract Act.

4.The orders impugned in these writ appeals are set aside and the Writ Appeals are allowed with the aforesaid liberty to the respondents.....”

6. In the light of the legal proposition laid down by the Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court, the fifth respondent is directed to return the original certificates/documents to the petitioner forthwith. It is open to the authorities to initiate appropriate action against the petitioner for enforcement of the bond conditions, if so advised.

7. With the above observations and directions, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top