SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 19226

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR, J
Abimanyu – Appellant
Versus
The Regional Passport Officer – Respondent
Writ Petition | File Number MD1065058061925



Advocates:
For the Petitioner: Mr.S.Vijayakumar
For R1: Mr.P.Santhoshkumar Central Govt. Standing Counsel
For R2:Mr.Vaikkam Karunanidhi Government Advocate (Crl.side)

A passport cannot be denied solely on the grounds of an FIR registration; pending criminal cases must be substantiated for denial under the Passports Act.

Headnote:The Court addresses the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, with the petitioner seeking a passport based on application MD1065058061925. Findings indicate that mere FIR registration is insufficient for denial under the Passports Act, 1967, Section 6(2)(f). The Court thus mandates the first respondent to process the application within four weeks, provided eligibility is met.

Table of Content
1. writ of mandamus sought for passport issuance. (Para 1 , 2)
2. requirement for criminal case for passport denial. (Para 4)
3. court ordered processing of passport application. (Para 5)

O R D E R

The petitioner is before this Court seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to issue a passport to the petitioner based on the application bearing File No. MD1065058061925 dated 20.05.2025.

2. Mr. P. Santhoshkumar, learned Central Government Standing Counsel, who accepts notice on behalf of the first respondent, on instructions, submitted that an FIR has been registered against the petitioner and therefore the application submitted by the petitioner has not yet been processed.

3. Mr. Vaikkam Karunanidhi, learned Government Advocate (Crl.

Side), who accepts notice on behalf of the second respondent, on instructions, submitted that the FIR is still under investigation and the charge sheet has not yet been filed.

4. Passport can be denied only if a criminal case is pending before a Criminal Court in India, as contemplated under Section 6(2)(f) of the Passports Act, 1967. Mere registration of an FIR is not a bar for issuance of a passport.

5. In view of the above, the Writ Petition stands disposed of directing the first respondent to consider the petitioner’s application bearing File No. MD1065058061925 dated 20.05.2025 and issue a passport to the petitioner, subject to the petitioner satisfying all other eligibility criteria. The said exercise shall be completed within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top