Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
C.KUMARAPPAN, J
Mariyaselvam – Appellant
Versus
The State rep. By The Inspector of Police (Crime), K-4, Anna Nagar Police Station, Anna Nagar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. anticipatory bail application details and allegations. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. court observations on the case merits and direction for inquiry. (Para 5 , 6) |
ORDER
The petitioner apprehends arrest for the alleged offences under Sections
316(2) and 318(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita , 2023 in Crime No. Not Known of 2026 on the file of the respondent police and seeks anticipatory bail.
2. It is the case of the prosecution that the petitioner received huge sums of money from the defacto complainant on the promise of securing a job abroad.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are false and that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he prayed for the grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
4. The said contention was strongly opposed by the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent, who submitted that so far no FIR has been registered and only summons have been issued to the petitioner.
Therefore, he prayed for the dismissal of the petition seeking anticipatory bail.
5. I have given anxious consideration to the submissions made by the learne
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
