Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
C.KUMARAPPAN, J
K.Govinthan – Appellant
Versus
The State rep by The Inspector of Police, Thirupalapanthal Police Station, Kallakurichi District – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. contextual background of the case and allegations. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments for and against the anticipatory bail. (Para 4) |
| 3. court's rationale for granting bail under specified conditions. (Para 5 , 6) |
ORDER
The petitioner apprehends arrest for the alleged offence under Section
326(g) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, in Crime No.185 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police and seeks anticipatory bail.
2. The allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner set fire to the vehicle bearing Registration No. TN-32-L-2869, belonging to the defacto complainant. Hence, the case.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that though the petitioner has been charged under Section 326(g) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, there is no previous case pending against him. It is submitted that due to vengeance, the defacto complainant has lodged a false complaint against the petitioner. The learned counsel further invited the attention of this Court to the recitals in the FIR and submitted that the petitioner has only been suspected and that the complaint is not based on first-hand information. It is also submitted that a civil suit is pending betw
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
