SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 19346

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.T. ASHA, J
M.Raman – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Tamil Nadu – Respondent
W.P. No. 10295 OF 2024



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.S.Jaganathan
For the Respondents: Mr.R.U.Dinesh Rajkumar, Additional Government Pleader

Part-time service cannot be counted towards pension qualifying service as per relevant rules and judicial precedents.

Headnote:Statute Analysis: The writ petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking to quash G.O.Ms.No. 77 dated 12.07.2013. Facts of the Case: The petitioner, who joined as a Panchayat Clerk in 1981 and retired in 2019, contested the exclusion of his previous part-time service from pension calculations.

Findings of Court:
The court found that under relevant government orders, only 50% of past part-time service can be included in pension calculations, but recent precedents deny this benefit.

Issues: The court framed the question whether the rejection of the petitioner's claim for including 50% of his past part-time service in his pension computation is sustainable.

Ratio Decidendi: The court reasoned that pursuant to established rules, part-time services are not qualifying for pension calculations.

Result: The Writ Petition stands dismissed.

Table of Content
1. claims for pension inclusion based on past service. (Para 1 , 2)
2. judicial precedents for pension calculations. (Para 4 , 5)
3. court's rationale against counting part-time service. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
4. final ruling on the petitioner's eligibility. (Para 12)

Order

This writ petition has been filed seeking to call for the records regarding G.O.Ms.No. 77, Rural Development Department 12.07.2013 and consequential impugned Order in Na.Ka.No. PA6/2985/2023 dated 12.10.2023 on the file of the 3rd respondent and quash the same.

2. The petitioner was appointed as a Panchayat Clerk on 01.09.1981 and worked as a part-time employee till 31.12.1990. Thereafter, his services were regularized and he was appointed as Panchayat Assistant on 01.01.1991. Subsequently, he was made permanent as Junior Assistant on 01.01.1999. The petitioner served in the Rural Development Department and ultimately retired from service on 31.03.2019, while holding the post of Deputy Block Development Officer (Administration), Sangarapuram Panchayat Union. At the time of retirement, the pension of the petitioner was calculated only by taking into account the service rendered from 01.01.1991 to 31.03.2019, i.e., the period after his regular appointment. The earlier service rendered by the petitioner from 01.09.1981 to 31.12.1990 as a part-time Panchayat Clerk was not taken into consideration for the purpose of pensionary benefits on the ground that the petitioner had worked only as a part-time employee during that period. In order to alleviate the hardship faced by employees who had been engaged for long periods as temporary or part-time workers, the Government had issued G.O.Ms.No.39, Rural Development Department, dated 13.06.2011, wherein it was provided that 50% of the service rendered in consolidated pay or part-time capacity shall be taken into account for the purpose of calculating pension, provided that the employee was absorbed as Junior Assistant before 01.04.2003. The said benefit was made applicable to those who had served as Part-time Village Assistant Grade I or II or as full-time or part-time Panchayat Clerk prior to their absorption.

3. The petitioner, who had joined service as a Panchayat Clerk in the year

1981 and was absorbed as Junior Assistant on 01.01.1999, is entitled to the benefit under the said Government Order. Accordingly, 50% of the service rendered by the petitioner from 01.09.1981 to 31.12.1990 ought to be counted towards pensionable service.

4. However, the respondents, relying upon G.O.Ms.No.77, Rural Development Department, dated 12.07.2013, refused to grant the said benefit. The issue regarding counting 50% of the past services of part-time Panchayat Clerks came up for consideration before this Court in a batch of writ petitions, in W.P.No.19264 of 2014 etc., and by order dated 30.06.2014, it was held that 50% of the past services rendered as part-time Panchayat Clerk should be taken into account for computing pensionary benefits. The said order was subsequently confirmed by the Hon’ble Division Bench in W.A.No.191 of 2016 dated 23.02.2016, and similar views were taken in other writ appeals including W.A.No.612 of 2016 dated 24.06.2016 and W.A.No.745 of 2019 dated

11.03.2019.

5. Following the earlier orders, this Court, by order dated 28.06.2023 in W.P.No.30207 of 2022, W.P.No.30197 of 2022 and W.P.No.30211 of 2011, quashed G.O.Ms.No.77 dated 12.07.2013 insofar as it excluded the counting of the part-time service for pensionary benefits. The Court also held that the beneficiaries are entitled to the benefit from the date of retirement and not from the date of the Government Order. Therefore, the petitioner is entitled to count 50% of the service rendered from 01.09.1981 to 31.12.1990 as part-time Panchayat Clerk for the purpose of pensionary benefits. The petitioner had made several representations to the respondents requesting them to count the said period of service and grant pensionary benefits. Despite the same,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top