Back
Next 
2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 19357
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR, J
Manikandan.C – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli – Respondent
Writ Petition|WMP(MD)Nos.2002 and 2004 of 2024
Advocates:
For the Appellant: Mr. M.Jegadeesha Pandian
For the Respondents: Mr.P.Subbaraj, Spl.Government Pleader
For the Appellant: Mr. M.Jegadeesha Pandian
For the Respondents: Mr.P.Subbaraj, Spl.Government Pleader
A writ petition can be dismissed as infructuous if the underlying issues are resolved.
Headnote:The judgment examines a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging a tender notification issued by the second respondent. The petition was rendered infructuous after the work order was completed by the successful bidder, leading to dismissal. The court found that there were no surviving issues for consideration. Consequently, the petition was dismissed with no costs.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to tender notification (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. dismissal of writ petition (Para 3) |
ORDER
Challenge in this writ petition is to the tender notification issued by the second respondent dated 09.01.2024.
2. The learned Special Government Pleader appeearing for the respondents submitted that following the tender notification, work order has been issued and work has been completed by the successful bidder.
3. In the light of the above, nothing survives for further consideration. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
