IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR, J
N.Dhashnamoorthy – Appellant
Versus
The Deputy Registrar of Cooperative Societies – Respondent
W.P(MD)No.3075 of 2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to notice (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court's interpretation of attachment law (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. final ruling on notice's validity (Para 6 , 7) |
ORDER
The petitioner challenges the notice dated 22.01.2026 bearing ep.k.vz.;
1/2026-27 (e.f.vz.;96/2026 rg) ehs; : 22.01.2026. By the said notice, the immovable properties belonging to the petitioner have been attached pending an enquiry under Section 81 of the Tamil Nadu Cooperative Societies Act.
2. The petitioner, upon attaining the age of superannuation, was permitted to retire from service. However, the terminal benefits due to the petitioner were not disbursed, which constrained the petitioner to approach this Court by filing W.P.(MD) No.29606 of 2025. This Court, by order dated 19.11.2025, directed the second respondent to release the petitioner’s retirement benefits. In the meanwhile, pending the enquiry under Section
81 of the Act, the impugned notice of attachment has been issued.
3. Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side.
4. A similar issue as to whether the immovable property belonging to an employee of a society can be attached before judgment under Section 167 of the Act was considered by a Coordinate Bench of this Court in W.P. No.
19173 of 2008. This Court, in paragraph 6 of the said order, held that a plain reading of Section 167 of the Tamil Nadu Cooperative Societies Act makes it clear that an order of attachment before judgment under Section 167(1) of the Act or conditional attachment under Section 167(2) of the Act can be made only in cases where proceedings are already pending on the file of the Deputy Registrar under Section 87, Section 90, Section 130, or Section 139 of the Act. In the present case, no proceedings are pending under any of the aforesaid provisions. What is pending against the petitioner is only an enquiry under Section 81 of the Act. There is no provision under the Act enabling attachment of immovable property before judgment during the pendency of an enquiry under Section 81.
5. The learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents relied upon a circular dated 12.08.2024 to substantiate the contention that an order of attachment before judgment can be made even during the pendency of an enquiry under Section 81 of the Act. However, the said circular has been issued contrary to the provisions of Section 167 of the Act. When the statute specifically provides for attachment before judgment only in respect of proceedings pending under the provisions enumerated therein, and in the absence of any statutory source of power enabling such attachment during an enquiry under Section 81, the circular cannot override the statutory provision and therefore cannot be given effect to.
6. In light of the above discussion, this Court is of the considered view that the impugned notice issued by the first respondent lacks statutory authority and is liable to be set aside.
7. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is allowed and the impugned notice dated 22.01.2026 bearing ep.k.vz.;1/2026-27 (e.f.vz;.96/2026 rg) ehs; : 22.01.2026 issued by the first respondent is set aside. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.