Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
K.Kumaresh Babu, J
R.Palanisamy (Died) – Appellant
Versus
Nach ammal (Died) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appellant challenges decree for partition. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments regarding entitlement under hindu law. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. court affirms equal rights for daughters. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. final ruling on the appeal. (Para 8) |
JUDGMENT
The present appeal has been made challenging the judgment and decree dated 05.01.2017 made in O.S.No.193 of 2015 on the file of II Additional District Cum Sessions Judge, Tiruppur
2. Heard, Mr.K.Govi Ganesan, learned counsel for the appellants and Mr.V.Nicholas, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents
2, 3, 5 to 7.
3. Mr.K.Govi Ganesan, the learned counsel appearing for the appellant would submit that respondents 1 to 3 herein had originally instituted a suit seeking for partition over the suit scheduled property on the contention that the same is an ancestral property. The said suit was resisted by the appellant as also the fourth respondent contending that the suit scheduled property had come to the father of the parties by way of a partition between himself and his brothers and therefore, he becomes the absolute owner of the property and by application of the Hindu Succession Act , the plaintiff would only be entitled to 1
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
