Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
C.KUMARAPPAN, J
Jeeva – Appellant
Versus
The State – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners arrested under bnss for preparation of dacoity. (Para 2) |
| 2. opposition to bail based on misused liberty and previous cases. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's decision against bail to prevent absconding. (Para 5 , 6) |
ORDER
The petitioners, who were arrested and remanded to judicial custody on
10.01.2026 for the alleged offences under Sections 310(4) and 310(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, in Crime No.10 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seek bail.
2. The allegation against the petitioners is that, cn 10.01.2026 at about
07.00 a.m., the petitioners, along with other accused persons, were found forming an unlawful assembly and allegedly making preparations for committing dacoity. Hence, the case.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that they have been in judicial custody since 10.01.2026 and that the charge against them is only with regard to preparation for dacoity. The learned counsel would further submit that the case has been falsely foisted against them and hence, it is a fit case to enlarge the petitioners on bail.
4. The said contention was strongly opposed by the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the res
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
