IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J
Pugalenthi @ Kavi – Appellant
Versus
The State – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. charge sheet details. (Para 2) |
| 2. authority and specificity in complaints. (Para 3 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. quashing of charge sheet. (Para 7) |
O R D E R
The present Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking to quash the charge sheet in S.T.C.No.177 of 2025 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court, Paramakudi.
2. A perusal of the charge sheet reveals that the petitioner is alleged to have put up flex boards to celebrate the marriage of his relative. The said flex boards were put up without permission of the authorities in order to celebrate the marriage of your family members and the said flex boards had obstructed the cameras put up by the police officials.
3. According to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the flex boards have not been seized and there is no specific allegation as against the petitioner and the authorities have not stated about the place of occurrence. He relied upon the decision of this Court in Crl.O.P.No.29104 of 2022, dated 28.11.2022, in (Siyabudheen Vs. State represented by its The Sub-Inspector of Police, Gudalur Police Station, Nilgiris) wherein, in similar circumstances, this Court has held in paragraph Nos.4 to 6 are as follow
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.