SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 19420

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J
S.Karuppasamy – Appellant
Versus
State of Tamilnadu – Respondent
Crl.OP.(MD)No.4627 of 2026 | Crl.M.P(MD)No.4914 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: M/s.S.Krishna Kumar
For the Respondents:Mr.B.Thanga Aravindh Government Advocate(crl.side) for R1

The court ruled on the petition to quash an FIR, noting investigation completion and granting the petitioner liberty to challenge the charge sheet.

Headnote:The petition seeks to quash the F.I.R. under Section 528 of the BNSS Act, 2023, in Crime No.39 of 2026. The court acknowledges that the investigation is complete, and a charge sheet has been laid in C.C.No.99 of 2026. The court concludes that nothing remains to be adjudicated and grants liberty to the petitioner to challenge the charge sheet if deemed appropriate. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also closed.

Table of Content
1. petition to quash fir filed under bnss act. (Para 1)
2. investigation completed with charge sheet filed. (Para 2)

ORDER

The present petition has been filed seeking to quash the F.I.R. in Cr.No.39 of 2026 dated 07.01.2026 on the file of the first respondent.

2. It is brought to the notice of the Court that the investigation has been completed and the charge sheet has been laid in C.C.No.99 of 2026 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Valliyoor.

3. In view of the above said facts, nothing survives to be adjudicated.

Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands closed with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the charge sheet if he is so advised. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top