Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M.DHANDAPANI, J
S.Krishnamoorthy – Appellant
Versus
The commissioner HR and CE Department – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ seeks to restrain event pending permission. (Para 1) |
| 2. petitioner states the case is infructuous. (Para 2) |
PRAYER; Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 to restrain the 5th respondent herein to conduct kumbabishekam scheduled to be held on 07.09.2022 for Arulmigu Shakthi Vinyagar at Arulmigu Shakthi Maariamman Temple without obtaining prior permission form the respondents 1 to 3 herein and in pursuant to the order passed by the 4th respondnet vide Na.Ka. No.
24/2021 dated 20.06.2022.
For Petitioner(s): Mr.K.M.Vivekanandan For Respondent(s): M/s. K.Karthikeyan, GA RR1 to 4 Mr.R.Prabhakaran R5
ORDER
This writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondents 1 to 3 to restrain the 5th respondent herein to conduct kumbabishekam scheduled to be held on 07.09.2022 for Arulmigu Shakthi Vinyagar at Arulmigu Shakthi Maariamman Temple without obtaining prior permission form the respondents 1 to 3 herein and in pursuant to the order passed by the 4th respondnet vide Na.Ka. No. 24/2021 dated 20.06.2022.
2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned couns
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
