Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M.DHANDAPANI, J
T.Rajendran – Appellant
Versus
The Commissioner Hindu Religious and charitable Endowments Department – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners' suspension and fit person appointment. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. court directions for administrative actions. (Para 6 , 8) |
| 3. writ petition conclusion. (Para 10) |
Order
The Writ Petition is filed challenging the impugned order of the 2nd respondent wherein the petitioners, who are the hereditary trustees of Arulmighu Vengaraiamman Temple, was temporarily suspended and appointed the 4th respondent as Fit Person.
2. The case of the petitioners is that they are the hereditary trustee of Arulmighu Vengaraiamman Temple situated in Vengarai Village, Paramathi Vellore Taluk, Namakkal District and thereby managed the affairs of the temple. While being so, on several false allegations of certain villagers against the petitioners, the 3rd respondent forced the petitioners to pass a resolution for appointment of an Executive Officer. The Executive Officer was also appointed on 09.03.2020, which was challenged in W.P.NO.13693 and 2020 and it is pending.
3. That being the position, based on the false allegations, the 2nd respondent has initiated disciplinary proceedings against the petitioners under Section 53(2) of the Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
