Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M.DHANDAPANI, J
Dr.B.R.Raveena – Appellant
Versus
The State of Tamil Nadu – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks quashing of posting order and return of documents. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. reduction in bond period and adjustment of terms benefits the petitioner. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. government advocate acknowledges the applicability of the new bond terms. (Para 5) |
| 4. court observations confirm the posting order's validity depends on bond status. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 5. court directs cancellation of bond and return of documents. (Para 8 , 9) |
Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records pertaining to the impugned posting order issued by the fourth respondent vide R.No.4655322/E5/A4/2023-347 dated 13.12.2024 and quash the same and further to direct the fifth respondent to return the petitioner’s original certificates and documents collected during her Post – Graduate admission along with her Post - Graduate degree certificate, Transfer certificate and conduct certificate.
For Petitioner : Mr.M.Vijaya Ragavan For Respondents : Mr.K.Tippu Sulthan Government Advocate
O R D E R
The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records pertaining to
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
