SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 19492

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.T. ASHA, J
J.Bharathi – Appellant
Versus
The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Limited (TANGEDCO) – Respondent



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Venkataramani, Senior Counsel for Mr.M.Muthappan
For the Respondents: Mr.K.Purushothaman, Standing Counsel for R.1 to R.3

Compassionate appointment under Article 226 must be considered expeditiously by the employer.

Headnote:This Writ Petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a writ of Mandamus for compassionate appointment due to the death of her husband while employed with the respondents. The court noted that the petitioner's representation for appointment was not considered and thus allowed the petition, directing consideration on merits within eight weeks. The primary issue was whether the petitioner was eligible for compassionate appointment. The court framed the question of her eligibility under compassionate grounds and emphasized the need for the respondents to act within a reasonable time frame as per established protocols. Therefore, the court directed the respondents to take action on the petitioner's request promptly, reflecting its commitment to uphold compassionate grounds for employment in this case.

Table of Content
1. writ petition for compassionate appointment. (Para 1 , 2)
2. court directed timely consideration of the petition. (Para 4)

ORDER

This Writ Petition has been filed for the following reliefs:-

“directing he Respondents to appoint the petitioner on compassionate grounds in commensurate with her educational qualification and otherwise, on account of death of her husband S.Jothi, formerly Commercial Assistant, on 02/02/2025 in a motor accident, within a reasonable time frame as deem fit by this Hon’ble Court and grant such other further relief as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit in the Circumstances of the case.”

2. The main grievance of the petitioner is that, despite being fully eligible for compassionate appointment on account of the death of her husband, who was employed in the respondent corporation and passed away on 02.02.2025, and despite submitting a representation seeking compassionate appointment on 24.03.2025, immediately following her husband’s death, to date, the respondents have not taken any steps to appoint the petitioner on compassionate grounds.

3.Heard the learned counsel on either side.

4. Considering the limited request of the petitioner and also taking note of the fact that the petitioner’s representation dated 24.03.2025 seeking compassionate appointment has not been considered to date, the Writ Petition is allowed. The respondents are directed to consider and pass orders on the petitioner’s representation dated 24.03.2025, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top