Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S. M. SUBRAMANIAM, K. SURENDER, JJ
G.Hemavathy – Appellant
Versus
Union Territory of Puducherry – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to eviction notice under relevant act. (Para 1) |
| 2. failure to comply with notice results in legal action. (Para 2) |
| 3. estate officer's powers under eviction act specified. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 4. petitions dismissed; future compliance encouraged. (Para 7) |
(Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM J.)
The present Writ Petitions have been instituted challenging the Form-A notice issued under sub-section (1) and clause (b)(ii) of sub-section (2) of Section 4 of Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971.
(hereinafter referred to as “the Act”)
2. The grounds for issuance of notice have been set out in the impugned call letter. The Deputy Collector (Revenue)-North-cum-Estate Officer, Puducherry, called upon the petitioners or their authorised representatives, capable of answering all material questions connected with the matter, to appear before him along with evidence for personal hearing on 03.08.2021 at 11.00 a.m. The petitioners, instead of appearing before the Estate Officer along with the relevant documents and evidences, have chosen to file the present Writ Petitions. Such summons issued by the Estate Officer, providing an opportuni
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
