IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Krishnan Ramasamy, J
S.KULASEKARA PANDIYAN – Appellant
Versus
THE SECRETARY TO GOVT. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. mandamus for considering representation (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. court's directive on administrative response timelines (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. final order for decision on representation (Para 6) |
Order
Heard Mr.B.Kannan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Mr.T.K.Saravanan, learned Additional Government Pleader for respondents 1, 3 and 4 and Ms.P.Veena Suresh, learned Standing Counsel for the second respondent.
2. This Writ Petition is filed seeking for the following prayer:-
For issuance of a mandamus directing the 1st and 2nd respondents to instruct the third respondent to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 22.10.2023.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner, seeking for the aforesaid relief, has made a representation dated 22.10.2023 to the respondents, however, as on the date, the same has not evoked any response, which necessitated the petitioner to approach this Court by way of present Writ Petition seeking for the aforesaid relief.
4. The learned Additional Government Pleader for the respondents 1, 3 and 4 fairly submitted that the representation made by the petitioner would be considered and disposed of on merits within th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.