Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J
R.Venkatesh – Appellant
Versus
The Registrar of Companies – Respondent
Writ Petition
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition to compel consideration of representation for cancellation. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. submission regarding failure to consider key representation. (Para 3) |
| 3. court directs timely consideration of the representation. (Para 4) |
| 4. decision to dispose writ petition with directive. (Para 5) |
ORDER
This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 03.08.2022.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in this case, the petitioner has given a representation dated 03.08.2022 for the cancellation of the incorporation of the company M/s. G.K. Development Pvt. Ltd. However, the said representation was not at all considered by the respondent till date.
Hence, this petition.
3. In reply, the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondent would submit that the petitioner's representation dated 03.08.2022 will be disposed of by the 2nd respondent within a period of 8 weeks.
4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondent and also perused the entire materials available on record.
5. In view of the above, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, this Court directs the 2nd respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 03.08.2022 and dispose of the same, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
6. With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No cost.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
