Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J
K.Munusamy – Appellant
Versus
The Revenue Divisional Officer Office of the RDO, Krishnagiri- 635-001 – Respondent
Writ Petition
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition filed under article 226 for mandamus. (Para 1) |
| 2. petition dismissed as the underlying matter was resolved. (Para 2) |
| 3. final ruling issued by the court. (Para 3) |
PRAYER Writ Petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st Respondent to consider the Petitioners representation to remove the name of the 3rd Respondent in the Impugned Joint Patta No. 1282 in Survey No.32 / 2 to an extent of 5 cents (0.2.00 ares) and dispose of the Petitioner representation dated 09.10.2022 within the time frame that may be fixed by this Honble Court.
For Petitioner(s): Mr.S.Arokiamaniraj For Respondent(s): Mr.C.Gowthamaraj, GA for R1 & 2 Mr.V.Regunathan, for R3
ORDER
This writ petition has been filed to direct the 1st Respondent to consider the Petitioners representation to remove the name of the 3rd Respondent in the Impugned Joint Patta No. 1282 in Survey No.32 / 2 to an extent of 5 cents (0.2.00 ares) and dispose of the Petitioner representation dated 09.10.2022.
2. When this matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that in this case, based on his representation, the name of 3rd respondent was removed from the Joint Patta and hence, nothing survives in this petition. Therefore, he requests this Court to dismiss the present petition.
3. In view of the above, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No cost.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
