Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J
Vignesh – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Tamilnadu – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks to recall witnesses for cross-examination. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. court finds merit in granting cross-examination. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. order set aside, directions for cross-examination issued. (Para 7 , 8) |
ORDER
The present Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking to set aside the order made in M.P.No.07 of 2025 in S.C.No.81 of 2022, on the file of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ramanathapuram, dated 16.02.2026, whereby the petition filed under Section 348 of the BNSS for recalling P.W.1 to P.W.3, P.W.
11 and P.W.12 for cross-examination was dismissed.
2. The P.W.1 to P.W.3 were examined on 01.07.2024, P.W.11 was examined on 16.06.2025, and P.W.12 was examined on 19.09.2025. The application to recall the said witnesses for cross-examination was filed on 05.11.2025, by which time L.W.14, the Investigating Officer had already been examined in chief.
3. According to the learned Counsel for the petitioner, the said application was dismissed by the trial Court on the ground that the petitioner was attempting to drag on the proceedings and that no proper reasons had been assigned for filing the said application at a belated stage. He further submits th
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
