SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 19684

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.T. ASHA, J
N.S.Sekar – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Tamil Nadu – Respondent
Writ Petition



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. T.Dharani
For the Respondents: Mr. C. Selvaraj

A Writ of Mandamus can be issued to compel official action on pending representations.

Headnote:The present Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing respondents to consider a representation for regularising the petitioner's services. The petitioner claims to have been engaged as a Temporary Mazdoor since 01.12.2000, performing duties of a permanent nature. The Court directs the respondents to adjudicate the representation on merits within three weeks. The final order disposes of the petition without costs.

Table of Content
1. petition for regularization based on long service. (Para 2)
2. court directs action on representation within time. (Para 4)
3. final order disposing of the writ petition. (Para 5)

The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, direction or order in the nature of Writ, directing the respondents to consider and pass order on the petitioner representation dated 05.02.2024 for regularize the services of the petitioner with effect from dated of appointment with all consequential service and monetary benefits.

For Petitioner(s): Mr. T.Dharani For Respondent(s): Mr. C. Selvaraj Additional Government Pleader

ORDER

The present Writ Petition has been filed for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to consider and pass order on the petitioner representation dated 05.02.2024 for regularize the services of the petitioner with effect from dated of appointment with all consequential service and monetary benefits.

2. The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner was appointed as a Temporary Mazdoor on daily wage basis with effect from 01.12.2000 in Guindy Children’s Park, Guindy National Park Range, Wildlife Division, and has been continuously discharging his duties without any break till date. The petitioner has been engaged on a full-time basis, performing duties of a permanent nature attached to the post of Mazdoor. Despite the petitioner having rendered long and uninterrupted service for several years, his services have not been regularised till date and the respondents have continued to engage the petitioner as a daily wage employee. Hence, the petitioner made a representation dated 05.02.2024 to the respondents for regularising his services with effect from the date of appointment. However, the respondents have not considered the same till date. Challenging the same, the present Writ Petition is filed.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.

4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made on either side, this Court directs the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 05.02.2024 and pass appropriate orders, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of three (3) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

5. With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top