SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 19721

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN, J
K.Krishnan – Appellant
Versus
S.Gnanavel – Respondent
Criminal Revision Case|C.A.No.80 of 2019|C.C.No.42 of 2017



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.S.Senthil Kumar for Mr.M.Krishnaveni
For the Respondents: Mr.M.Vijaya Ragavan

Settlement of dues renders criminal convictions under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act untenable.

Headnote:The case pertains to a criminal revision filed under Section 397 read with 401 of Cr.P.C., challenging the judgments from the trial court and appellate court regarding a conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for cheque dishonor. The court found that the matter had been amicably settled with the respondent receiving the full payment of Rs.7,00,000/-. The court set aside previous judgments in light of the settlement, concluding that there were no longer grounds for the appeal.

Table of Content
1. details of the criminal conviction under section 138 (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. petitioner settled the matter with the respondent (Para 4 , 5)
3. court's acceptance of the settlement and judgment reversal (Para 7)

ORDER

This Criminal Revision Case has been filed against the judgment dated

10.02.2021 passed in C.A.No.80 of 2019 on the file of the learned III Additional Sessions Judge, Villupuram, Kallakurichi, thereby confirming the judgment dated 07.11.2019 passed in C.C.No.42 of 2017 by the learned Judicial Magistrate (Fast Track), Kallakurichi.

2. The petitioner is an accused in the complaint lodged by the respondent before the learned Judicial Magistrate (Fast Track Court), Kallakurichi, for the alleged offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, alleging that on 09.09.2016, the petitioner had borrowed a sum of Rs.7,00,000/- from the respondent for the purpose of his family expenses. In order to repay the same the petitioner had issued a cheque bearing No.662559, dated 12.10.2016 in favour of the respondent. The said cheque was presented for collection and the same was returned with an endorsement “Funds Insufficient on the account of the accused”. Thereafter, on 10.11.2016, the respondent issued a legal notice to the petitioner. As there was no reply from the petitioner, the respondent has filed the complaint.

3. After a full fledged trial, the trial Court convicted the petitioner under Section 138 of the Act and sentence him to undergo one year simple imprisonment and to pay a sum of Rs.7,00,000/- in default further simple imprisonment for three months, vide judgment dated 07.11.2019. Further, the learned Judicial Magistrate ordered that the fine amount be paid to the respondent as a compensation. Aggrieved over the same, the petitioner had preferred a criminal appeal before the Appellate Court viz., III Additional Sessions Judge, Villupuram at Kallakurichi in C.A.No.80 of 2019. The Appellate Court had dismissed the said criminal appeal vide judgment dated 10.02.2021, confirming the judgment passed by the trial Court in C.C.No.42 of 2017 dated 07.11.2019. Challenging the same, the petitioner has filed the present criminal revision case.

4. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that, pending the criminal revision case, the matter was referred to the regular Lok Adalat for amicable settlement. Accordingly, the matter was settled before the Lok Adalat, by paying the entire amount to the respondent.

5. The learned counsel for the respondent has also acknowledged the receipt of the entire payment of Rs.7,00,000/- (Rupees Seven Lakhs Only) from the petitioner.

6. Heard both sides and perused the entire materials available on record.

7. In view of the above submission made by the learned counsel on either side and taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner has paid the entire amount of Rs.7,00,000/- (Rupees Seven Lakhs Only) to the respondent, this Court is inclined to set aside the judgment dated 10.02.2021 passed in C.A.No.80 of 2019 on the file of the learned III Additional Sessions Judge, Villupuram, Kallakurichi, as well as the judgment dated 07.11.2019 passed in C.C.No.42 of 2017 by the learned Judicial Magistrate (Fast Track), Kallakurichi.

8. With the aforesaid terms, this Criminal Revision Case is allowed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top