IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
T.V.THAMILSELVI, J
Santha W/o.Elavarasan – Appellant
Versus
Selvam S/o.Subburaya Mooper – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application for reopening evidence. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. contentions regarding necessity of cross-examination. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
COMMON ORDER
Challenging the impugned Order passed in I.A.Nos.252 and 253 of 2024 filed by the petitioners to reopen the evidence of the P.W.1 and recall P.W.1 for cross examination, the present revision petitions have been filed.
2. The petitioners are the defendants in the suit. The plaintiffs have filed the suit for partition and separate possession and for declaration of documents as null and void. In the suit P.W.1 and P.W.2 were examined and the plaintiff's side evidence has already been closed. On the side of the defendants, D.W.1 to D.W.3 have been examined and the suit is now posted for arguments. At this stage, the defendants have filed the present applications to reopen the evidence on the side of the plaintiffs and recall P.W.1 for the purpose of cross examination. The said applications have been dismissed by the trial Court on the ground that P.W.1 was cross examined on the side of the defendants for four times and the petitioner has come forward with these application without assigning any proper reason. Challenging the same, the p
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.