Back
Next 
2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 19822
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
B.PUGALENDHI, J
Neelakanda Pillai @ Balan – Appellant
Versus
The State rep by the Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Kanyakumari. – Respondent
CrlA(MD)No.984 of 2025
Important Points
The court allows the petitioner to withdraw the bail petition, resulting in its dismissal.
Subject
Criminal Law - Bail
Act Referred
Headnote
This judgment involves a petition filed under Section 430 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita to suspend the sentence imposed by the Fast Track Mahila Court under the POCSO Act. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn upon the request of the petitioner. Key issues include the petitioner seeking bail pending appeal, with the court ultimately granting permission to withdraw the petition. The final outcome: 'This petition is dismissed as withdrawn for the present.'
Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.M.Sankar
For the Respondents:Mr.AS.Abul Kalaam Azad, Government Advocate
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.M.Sankar
For the Respondents:Mr.AS.Abul Kalaam Azad, Government Advocate
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition for bail under pocso act. (Para 1) |
| 2. petitioner withdraws the petition. (Para 2) |
ORDER
When this petition is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this court to withdraw this petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.
2.Permission is granted. This petition is dismissed as withdrawn for the present.
