SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 19858

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CJ, G.ARUL MURUGAN, J
S.Rajiv Gandhi – Appellant
Versus
The Revenue Divisional Officer O/o.Revenue Divisional Office Virudhachalam Cuddalore District – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.C.Samivel
For the Respondents: Mr.E.Vijay Anand Addl. Govt. Pleader for R1 to R4

Table of Content
1. withdrawal of the petition allowed. (Para 1)
2. dismissal of the petition without costs. (Para 2)

Learned counsel for petitioner seeks to withdraw the petition.

2. Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top