SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 19866

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR, J
Punitha – Appellant
Versus
The Commissioner of Police Trichy City, Tirchy District – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.J.Senthil Kumaraiah
For the Respondents: Mr.B.Ramanathan, Mr.P.M.Vishnu Varthanan

Table of Content
1. withdrawal request made. (Para 1)
2. petition dismissed as withdrawn. (Para 2 , 3)

O R D E R

Learned counsel for the petitioner has given a letter, dated

10.03.2026, to the Registry, for listing this writ petition under the caption “For Withdrawal”.

2. Accordingly, this writ petition is listed today under the caption “For Withdrawal” and today, learned counsel for the petitioner has also made an endorsement in the court bundle seeking permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition.

3. Recording the same, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top