Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J
Venklataraj Traders – Appellant
Versus
Shanmugasundaram – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts stating eviction claims under the tnrrrlt act. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. court observations on cross-examination rights. (Para 9 , 12 , 16 , 17) |
| 3. dispute over landlord's need for eviction. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 4. ratio on conditions for tenant's rights to cross-examine. (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 5. final ruling on the civil revision petitions. (Para 19) |
COMMON O R D E R
Heard Mr.N.Mariyappan for the petitioner and Mr.V.N.Arjun, for Mr.N.Vallinayagam for the respondent.
2. These Civil Revision Petitions challenge the order passed by the learned Principal District Munsif, Madurai in I.A.No.2 and I.A.No.3 of 2025 in R.L.T.O.P.No.21 of 2024, dated 02.08.2025.
3. For the sake of convenience, the parties shall be referred to as landlord and tenant.
4. The landlord approached the Rent Court under the Tamil Nadu Regulation of Rights and Responsibilities of Landlords and Tenants Act, 2017, seeking eviction. He sought eviction on multiple grounds. The first ground being that the landlord and tenant had failed to enter into an agreement, as required, under Section 4(2) of TNRRRLT Act. The second ground being that the premises is required for rebuilding, as addition or alteration cann
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
