Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M.DHANDAPANI, J
Madhanalal D Chawla – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector Salem District – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to quarry lease notification and safety concern. (Para 1 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. petitioner's rights to raise objections considered. (Para 2 , 5) |
| 3. court directs timely consideration of objections. (Para 6) |
ORDER
Challenging the tender notification dated 29.01.2026 issued by the first respondent in Rc. No 36/ 2026 / Mines -A, insofar as it relates to the poramboke lands in S.No.3 (Part) and 39 (part), Sandiyur Village, Salem Taluk and District, the present Writ Petition has been filed. Consequently, the petitioner has sought for a direction to forbid the respondents from renewing, re-auctioning, or granting any quarry lease in respect of the said lands.
2. Heard the learned counsels appearing on either side.
3. It is the case of the petitioner that he is the owner of the properties comprised in Survey Nos.12 to 24 to an extent of 70 acres of industrial classified lands situated in Sandiyur Village, Salem Taluk and District, which were subjected to quarry leases earlier last being on 25.02.2024. Due to continuation of quarrying activities in S.Nos.3 (Part) and 39 (part), Sandiyur Village, Salem Taluk and District, which are Government Poramboke lands, the petitioner al
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
