Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J
Krishnasamy – Appellant
Versus
Vijayalakshmi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. violation of natural justice due to non-speaking order. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. lack of consideration for objections and supporting documents. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. order quashed and remanded for fresh consideration. (Para 6) |
| 4. final order with directives for reconsideration. (Para 7) |
ORDER
This writ petition has been filed, challenging the impugned order dated
15.08.2025 passed by the third respondent, rejecting the petitioner’s application seeking for subdivision of patta in the name of the petitioner for the property, morefully disclosed in the prayer to this writ petition.
2.The petitioner has challenged the impugned order on the ground of violation of principles of natural justice and on the ground that it is a non-
speaking order.
3.Mr.C.Jayaprakash, learned Government Advocate accepts notice on behalf of respondents 1 to 3. Since no adverse order is being passed against the fourth respondent, notice to the fourth respondent is dispensed with by this Court.
4.Admittedly, as seen from the impugned order, it is a non-speaking order with regard to the petitioner’s contentions and the supporting documents, filed by the petitioner. Except stating that there are objections raised by b
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
