Back
Next 
2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 20306
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
B.PUGALENDHI, J
P.Yogaraj – Appellant
Versus
The State of Tamil Nadu – Respondent
CrlA(MD)No.265 of 2025
Important Points
The petitioner has the right to withdraw an appeal against sentencing at any stage, which the court may grant.
Subject
Criminal Law - Bail and Sentencing
Act Referred
Headnote
This case involves the interpretation of Section 430 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita regarding the suspension of a sentence pending an appeal. The petitioner, P.Yogaraj, sought to withdraw his appeal against the state's imposition of a sentence. The court granted permission to withdraw and dismissed the petition. The primary issue was whether the petition could be withdrawn at this stage. The court affirmed the right of the petitioner to withdraw the motion.
Result: This petition is dismissed as withdrawn for the present.
Result: This petition is dismissed as withdrawn for the present.
Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.NA.Manimaran
For the Respondents: Mr.T.Senthil Kumar
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.NA.Manimaran
For the Respondents: Mr.T.Senthil Kumar
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks to withdraw appeal. (Para 1) |
| 2. court grants withdrawal and dismisses petition. (Para 2) |
ORDER
When this petition is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this court to withdraw this petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.
2.Permission is granted. This petition is dismissed as withdrawn for the present.
