SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 20306

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
B.PUGALENDHI, J
P.Yogaraj – Appellant
Versus
The State of Tamil Nadu – Respondent
CrlA(MD)No.265 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.NA.Manimaran
For the Respondents: Mr.T.Senthil Kumar

The petitioner has the right to withdraw an appeal against sentencing at any stage, which the court may grant.

Headnote:This case involves the interpretation of Section 430 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita regarding the suspension of a sentence pending an appeal. The petitioner, P.Yogaraj, sought to withdraw his appeal against the state's imposition of a sentence. The court granted permission to withdraw and dismissed the petition. The primary issue was whether the petition could be withdrawn at this stage. The court affirmed the right of the petitioner to withdraw the motion.

Result: This petition is dismissed as withdrawn for the present.

Table of Content
1. petitioner seeks to withdraw appeal. (Para 1)
2. court grants withdrawal and dismisses petition. (Para 2)

ORDER

When this petition is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this court to withdraw this petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.

2.Permission is granted. This petition is dismissed as withdrawn for the present.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top