IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CJ, G.ARUL MURUGAN, J
R.Francis Ambrose – Appellant
Versus
The Principal Secretary, Housing and Urban Development Department, Government of Tamilnadu – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition seeks enforcement actions. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. prior litigation affects current petition. (Para 3) |
Heard the petitioner / Party-in-Person.
2. The writ petition seeks for a direction to the official respondents to carry out necessary enforcement actions in respect of the unlawful structures put up by the private respondents 8 and 9.
3. At the outset, it is to be noted that the petitioner had earlier filed W.P.No.33219 of 2024 in respect of the same complaint. Status report was filed and certain unauthorized constructions were noticed. Submissions were made by the private respondents that in respect of the construction of the Church made more than 50 years ago, they have applied for regularization. It was stated by the Corporation that the regularisation application will be examined as per the provisions of applicable laws. By recording the submissions, by order dated
11.09.2025, the writ petition was adjourned and it is still pending. 4. Subsequently, the 9th respondent also preferred a writ petition in W.P.No.44830 of 2025 for a direction to CMDA to consider their representation for regularisation. However, since the regularisation application already came to be
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.